Date: 2010-01-29 06:52 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] labelle77.livejournal.com
Mine too. I already have a laptop AND an iphone, I can't imagine anything I would need an ipad for. And you'd look damn silly holding that up to your ear.

Date: 2010-01-29 07:06 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] jackshoegazer.livejournal.com
If it actually made phone calls, which it doesn't. It doesn't even have 3G capability. It wouldn't even be a laptop replacement because you couldn't use it on your lap :P

Date: 2010-01-30 05:34 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] labelle77.livejournal.com
From what I've read, the basic $500 version that is 16 gigs doesn't have 3G. If you pay lots lots more for the 64 gig, it is 3G enabled. Then if you pay an extra $150, you can have it with phone capabilities, and then you have to pay AT&T for the plan. So by that point, you've just paid out about the cost of a lower-end macbook for a very giant iphone that won't even let you watch videos online because it doesn't even freaking have flash player.

Date: 2010-01-30 05:47 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] jackshoegazer.livejournal.com
Ooooh, that sounds like *such* a good deal :P

Date: 2010-01-29 07:02 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] hellocthulhu.livejournal.com
Except for the part where it doesn't have 3G.

That, to me, is the killer defect here. Unless it will be tetherable.

Date: 2010-01-29 07:05 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] jackshoegazer.livejournal.com
I fail to see the point of it at all. I haven't heard anyone clamoring for an extra-big iTouch.

Date: 2010-01-29 07:11 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] hellocthulhu.livejournal.com
If they'd combined the mobile features of the iPhone with something that had the horsepower to rival netbooks and low-end laptops, I'd see the market.

Date: 2010-01-29 06:21 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] purplemb13.livejournal.com
Actually, they are producing 3G-capable models. (I pity the current 3G network users when that goes live, though.)

Date: 2010-01-30 05:23 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] hellocthulhu.livejournal.com
Huh, interesting, I wasn't aware of that. Of course, if they put it on AT&T's network, it might as well not have it...

Date: 2010-01-29 02:02 pm (UTC)

Date: 2010-01-29 03:43 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] tyskkvinna.livejournal.com
I'm right there with you.

Date: 2010-01-29 06:24 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] jupiterlejano.livejournal.com
I agree, I just find it lame, starting by the name. Obviously if someone wants to give it to me as a present I won't reject it, but I will still find it super lame.

Haha, yes!

Date: 2010-01-30 12:47 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] fortepiano.livejournal.com
http://www.theonion.com/content/news_briefs/frantic_steve_jobs_stays_up

Date: 2010-01-30 02:45 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] alovelyfeather.livejournal.com
lol seriously!

Profile

jackshoegazer: (Default)
jackshoegazer

February 2012

S M T W T F S
   12 34
567891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
26272829   

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jul. 8th, 2025 04:19 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios