I don't really have a problem with conspiracy theories -- I find it entirely plausible that the US govt let 9/11 happen, for example -- but a lot of the 9/11 theorists are full of shit. Some of their arguments are just chock full of logical fallacies, not to mention silly. This (http://www.counterpunch.org/johnstone09152006.html) offers some good counter-arguments for some of the more common arguments, though not of anything posted in the piece above, I don't think.
What really bugs me is how most people are so dismissive of even the possibility of a conspiracy. It's not like there haven't been actual conspiracies before! I mean, even if a theory is proven false, it's always worth analyzing. I just ask that the analysis be rational.
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
timeasmymeasure
no subject
Date: 2006-10-15 10:47 am (UTC)I don't really have a problem with conspiracy theories -- I find it entirely plausible that the US govt let 9/11 happen, for example -- but a lot of the 9/11 theorists are full of shit. Some of their arguments are just chock full of logical fallacies, not to mention silly. This (http://www.counterpunch.org/johnstone09152006.html) offers some good counter-arguments for some of the more common arguments, though not of anything posted in the piece above, I don't think.
What really bugs me is how most people are so dismissive of even the possibility of a conspiracy. It's not like there haven't been actual conspiracies before! I mean, even if a theory is proven false, it's always worth analyzing. I just ask that the analysis be rational.