It's the economy, stupid.
Sep. 13th, 2008 09:51 pm![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)

Those whose income is under $67,000 - 60% of all American taxpayers - would see substantially larger tax cuts under the Obama plan. While McCain’s plan concentrates 58% of its benefits to the wealthiest 1% of Americans, Obama’s rollback of the Bush tax cuts above $250,000 produces tax increases for that group.
Sadly, Obama’s story is not getting through. In the face of the TPC’s analysis showing that 95% of American taxpayers would see savings under the Obama tax plan, 53% of the Gallup respondents wrongly believe their tax burden would increase under President Obama. Meanwhile, despite the same analysis showing McCain’s plan to make permanent and expand the Bush tax cuts would produce a staggering $2.8 trillion in red ink for the federal budget, the Republican still claims the mantle of fiscal discipline.
Source
no subject
Date: 2008-09-14 04:50 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-09-14 09:20 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-09-14 10:03 pm (UTC)I think a flat tax would be fair, with no write-offs. I don't think it's fair to punish people for having too much money, or for being poor. My idea of progress would be for the government to take out taxes before we are paid, 9% across the board, not require filing of taxes for those who have already had them taken, no tax refunds, and pretty much put H&R Block out of business. Well, not really, because not everyone works in such a way to have taxes taken out before getting paid.
That chart does show that Obama is far more fiscally responsible than McCain.
no subject
Date: 2008-09-14 10:17 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-09-14 10:27 pm (UTC)It's safer to shout at LJ. No broken bones. ;)